SMART PRIVACY CLEANER 4.0 PATCH
One thing that isn’t immediately obvious in the Smart Cities context is whether there has been any attention to Privacy by Design principles – that is, designing privacy into all these groovy functionalities and platforms from the outset as opposed to trying to patch privacy holes when they arise in the future. “The technology is already here, already being trialled, already part of many urban landscapes” If you are involved in any of the initiatives listed above this is a resource that can assist in crafting a policy to respond to concerns. It's pretty neat and does a good job of making privacy concerns digestible. There is an interactive tool published by the Future of Privacy Forum that highlights top privacy concerns associated with Smart Cities. route planners, transportation services) and
There are a number of initiatives that raise privacy flags, particularly in terms of how citizens may perceive an erosion of their privacy rights. a mechanism for citizens to make privacy complaints.Ģ. If you were to list them, what are your top initiatives that we may see in our Smart Cities that would benefit from a level of privacy caution?.the ability for citizens to access and (if necessary) correct the personal information held about them and.conducting privacy impact assessments (PIA) when new systems or technologies are proposed.having in place a dedicated "chief privacy officer" (or someone similarly named and empowered).Privacy officers can assist in both identifying these concerns and coordinating targeted information privacy programs in cities in order to address them.Ī good privacy program includes – at a minimum: Privacy concerns associated with these initiatives can be both real/ measurable (that is, there is an actual risk) and perceived (that is, there is a worry or a fear within the community ).
Smart Cities initiatives are all about using the data of our urban environments and our citizens, which necessarily includes personal information, to make life better – more connected, more accessible, faster, cleaner, safer and sustainable into the future. The questions we had in mind were as follows:ġ. How can privacy officers assist in the roll out of Smart Cities initiatives? In preparing for our panel discussion, which took the form of a casual fireside chat, Grace and I worked out a few questions that (if our audience didn’t move discussion in other directions) may generate a level of post-event privacy assessment in the various groups represented in the room municipal government, strategy, urban planning, vendor engagement, cyber-security, research and governance. In the privacy profession, I have learned that much can be accomplished when privacy becomes a topic of opportunity (rather than a road block). The premise of the Smart City is that it leverages technology within cities for social good, sustainability, resilience and equity, primarily evident in the foundational sectors of smart cities - from mobility and transportation to health, infrastructure, energy and finance.
SMART PRIVACY CLEANER 4.0 FULL
How would I talk about all that worries me about Smart Cities in a room full of people who are excited about building and refining our urban centres so that they are efficient, connected, safe and sustainable? Catchy, right? Well, when I was invited to join my colleague Grace Guinto (of PWC) on a Cities 4.0 panel discussing that very thing, I was a bit stumped. 83 (April 2018), International Association of Privacy Professionals ANZ (iappANZ). This article first appeared in Privacy Unbound, Edition No.
0 kommentar(er)
